Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

41 Comments

  1. Canola Oil comes from canola seeds… it does NOT come from rape seed. You need to study the history of Canola… to say it’s derived from rape seeds just damages your credibility.

  2. I would like to know if just plain lard like “Tenderflake” is safe to use, especially for deep frying. What is the smoking point? After using it, can it be stored in a sealer or safe container for the next use? I don’t have a deep fryer yet, however, I do need an inch or two or how fat for cutletes and chicken. What do you suggest?

    1. I would stick with grass fed lard since lard from factory farmed animals can be higher in inflammatory fats 🙂

  3. You are misinformed about canola oil. We don’t cook with flax oil or fish oil because it has a low smoking point. The low smoking point degrades the oil, makes it harmful, and tastes bad. If canola oil, flaxseed oil, and fish oil had the same exact components they would logically have the same smoking point. Obviously, there is something that distinguishes canola oil but, as you pointed out, it’s not the omega ratio. omega rati is irrelevant as both omegas are polyunsaturated fat, thus have a similar smoking point. What determines the smoke point of an oil is very straightforward. Just like everything in chemistry, the stronger the bond, the lower the melting point. It’s the same reason why butter is solid and canola oil is liquid. For fats, it goes polyunsaturated(both omega 3 and 6), monounsaturated, trans fats, saturated fats. Canola oil is 65% monounsaturated fat while flax is 73% polyunsaturated fat. So obviously flax will smoke/burn/degrade at a lower temperature. Your second point makes no sense. As long as you cook below the smoke point you are fine. If that wasn’t the case, then we shouldn’t be cooking with anything with omegas in it. That is kinda hard to do since all butter/oil has omegas in it.

  4. Thank you for all your information about unhealthful cooking oils.
    I would like to know about your medical or nutritional background and if you have documentation and actual clinical studies as well as the names of scientists and their backgrounds to back up what you’ve written about unhealthful cooking oils.
    Thank you for your time and effort.

    1. All of the scientific research is linked to within the article as well as at the bottom of the article under “Sources”.

  5. It amazes me how mush BS there is out there that demonizes some oils and not others. There are many instances where the very reason given for a particular oil is bad for you, that the “better” oils have the same properties/conditions when all is said and done. So much rhetoric and no real understanding of the manufacturing process and final composition of the oils we ingest. All smoke and mirrors as Chicken little runs around.

  6. I enjoyed this article but it should be longer. Now I have to click another page to see the good suggestions. I dont like that. But the info is worth its weight in gold. So thank you.

  7. This, along with your “healthiest cooking oils” article, is excellent. You are one of the unimaginably-few decent ones out there who do not sell out, do the research, and are brave enough to speak truthfully about so many of these accepted “facts”. I’m one of those who have learned the hard way that most of what we’re taught about nutrition and foods, is just plain wrong, and that most definitely includes profitability-oriented topics like cooking oils. Anyway I think you’re awesome and admirable (and frankly, to me pretty much correct on just about all of your points). Ignore the negative, insulting naysayers who slither in…they are unfortunately inevitable whenever one bucks the herd.